Amerisave Logo
Amerisave Logo
13 Types of Real Estate Investment: How to Choose the Right One

13 Types of Real Estate Investment: How to Choose the Right One

Author: Cam FindlayCam Findlay
Updated on: |9 min read
Fact CheckedFact Checked

Real estate investing runs from hands-on rental property to shares you can buy in seconds. The 13 approaches below each carry a different cost, return, and risk profile, and the rate environment shapes every one of them. Knowing how they differ helps you match a strategy to your timeline and how much work you actually want to do.

Key Takeaways

  • Real estate investments split into active plays that trade your time for control (rental property, house hacking, short-term rentals, flipping, wholesaling) and passive plays that trade control for liquidity (REITs, REIT funds, crowdfunding, syndications).
  • The entry price ranges from the cost of one REIT share to a 20% to 25% down payment on a rental, which can mean $85,000 or more on a median-priced home.
  • Mortgage rates are the tide under all of it. Rates come from the bond market, and the bond market answers to the supply of money and the flow of global currency, not to any single announcement.
  • Publicly traded REITs have returned roughly 9.4% a year over the past 25 years, with about half of that coming from dividends, though they swing hard in a bad year.
  • House flipping looks profitable on paper, yet the typical flip recently cleared about a 25.5% gross return before rehab and holding costs, the thinnest margin since the last housing crash.
  • The tax code rewards holding: depreciation, the 1031 exchange, and the 20% deduction on REIT dividends all lower the real cost of owning.
  • Pick the type that fits your timeline and your tolerance for hands-on work first; the specific vehicle comes second.

Before you pick a type, start with your timeline

Most people who ask me how to invest in real estate start with the wrong question. They want to know which type makes the most money. The better first question is the one I ask about almost any financial decision: what's your timeline, and how much of your own time are you willing to put in? A strategy that works beautifully for someone with a decade to wait and a tolerance for tenant calls can be the wrong fit for someone who wants their money working quietly in the background.

Real estate rewards patience and punishes activity for its own sake. Wealth in this asset class tends to come from a handful of good decisions held for a long time, not from constant trading. So before you compare returns, it helps to sort the options by two things: how much control and effort each one demands, and how quickly you can get your money back if you need it.

Every real estate investment sits somewhere on a spectrum between two extremes. On one end are the active plays, where you trade your time and attention for control. You own the actual property, you make the decisions, and you capture more of the upside because you're doing more of the work. On the other end are the passive plays, where you trade that control for liquidity and simplicity. You buy a share of a portfolio someone else manages, and you can sell it in seconds.

Neither end is better. They solve different problems. A rental property can build real equity and throw off monthly cash flow, but it can also call you at midnight about a broken water heater. A share in a real estate fund will never call you, but you also can't renovate it, refinance it, or negotiate its price. This is the sort of matching problem the capital-markets team at AmeriSave works through constantly, just on the financing side rather than the property side, lining up the structure with the goal before chasing the headline number.

There's also a force underneath every one of these choices that most guides skip. When you borrow to buy property, the rate you pay is set in the bond market, and the bond market moves for reasons that have nothing to do with your deal. Understanding that lets you time your entry around the mortgage instead of hoping the mortgage cooperates with your plans. The 13 types below run from most hands-on to most passive, with that rate lens applied to each.

The rate environment is the tide under everything

Here's the piece most real estate guides leave out. Almost every strategy on this list is sensitive to one thing: the cost of money. When you borrow to buy a rental, the mortgage rate decides whether the deal cash-flows. When you buy a REIT, its share price reacts to where rates are heading, because a REIT is valued partly on the yield it pays relative to safer alternatives. Rates are the tide, and the tide moves every boat in the marina.

So it helps to know where rates actually come from. They don't move because someone in Washington decides they should. They move because of the bond market, and the bond market is responding to forces underneath it: geopolitical events, the supply of money, and the value of the dollar relative to the currencies that buy our debt. That last layer is the one most people never see.

Walk through it with a number. Say a foreign investor buys a Treasury bond paying 4%. If the dollar weakens after that purchase, the investor gets fewer of their home-currency units back when they convert the interest, even though the stated yield never changed. The real return shrinks. So they sell, or they demand a higher yield to keep holding. The market reprices, and mortgage rates drift up. Nothing about your loan changed, but the price of your loan did, because it's downstream of a system, not the output of a single decision.

There's a second reason mortgage rates sit higher than the government bond yield you see quoted, and it matters for anyone financing property. Part of the gap is the cost to service the loan, which most borrowers don't realize exists. Another part is the credit spread, the cushion lenders build in for default risk. When more borrowers fall behind, lenders widen that spread, and the extra cost lands on every new borrower, not just the ones who defaulted. Your rate is a shared cost, priced off collective behavior.

Why does this belong in a guide about investment types? Because it tells you which lever you actually control. You can't control where rates go. You can control your timeline, the price you negotiate, and whether you refinance later. Read the right signals, the bond market, the dollar, and the events that move both, and the daily noise starts to look like a pattern instead of a coin flip. That reading is a core part of how the capital-markets desk at AmeriSave frames decisions, and it's just as useful to an investor sizing up a rental as it is to a lender pricing a loan.

Active, hands-on ways to invest in real estate

These are the strategies where you own or control the actual property and do the work yourself. They ask the most of your time and tie up your capital the longest, and in exchange they hand you the most control over the outcome and usually the largest share of the profit when a deal goes well. They also carry the most concentrated risk, because your money sits in one building in one market.

1. Rental property (buy-and-hold)

Owning a home or a small multi-unit building and renting it out is the strategy most people picture first. You collect rent each month, the tenant's payments chip away at your loan balance, and the property has a chance to appreciate while you hold it. On a median-priced home of roughly $429,300, a standard investor mortgage asks for 20% to 25% down, so you're putting in something like $85,000 to $110,000 before closing costs and a repair reserve. In lower-cost markets, that entry number drops considerably.

The return has four parts working together: the rent you collect after expenses, the appreciation on the property, the loan balance your tenant pays down for you, and the tax benefits. That's the appeal, several engines pulling at once. The risk is concentration and illiquidity. A vacant month is a month of paying the mortgage yourself, and roughly 7% of rental units sit empty at any given time nationally. Selling takes weeks and costs real money in commissions.

Rentals suit investors with a multi-year timeline who want control and don't mind being a landlord, or paying someone to be one. Here's where the rate lens matters: buy when you've negotiated the right price, finance it at whatever rate is available, and plan to refinance if rates fall later. Because investor loans price differently from owner-occupied ones, a lender like AmeriSave will quote a rental differently than a primary residence, which is worth knowing before you shop. The price is the durable win. You can't renegotiate it after the deal closes.

2. House hacking

House hacking is the lowest-cost way onto the property ladder. You buy a two- to four-unit building, live in one unit, and rent out the others, or you rent out spare bedrooms in a single-family home. Because you're living there, you qualify as an owner-occupant, which means a much smaller down payment than an investor loan requires. An FHA-backed loan can go as low as 3.5% down on up to four units, and some conventional owner-occupant options start around 3% to 5%.

The math can be genuinely good. Your tenants' rent offsets some or all of your housing payment, so you're building equity and cutting your own cost of living at the same time. And because owner-occupant loans price better than investor loans, your rate is usually lower than it would be on a pure rental. That's a real edge worth understanding before you rule it out.

The trade-off is that you live next to your tenants and you have to actually occupy the place, so it's a commitment, not a passive check. Getting a preapproval early tells you exactly what you can afford as an owner-occupant, and AmeriSave calls its verified preapproval tier Certified Approval. The strategy tends to fit younger buyers and first-time investors who want to start building real estate exposure without a large pile of cash upfront. Letting a first-time home buyer become an investor in the same move is worth a serious look.

3. Short-term and vacation rentals

A short-term rental is a furnished property you rent by the night or the week instead of the year, usually in a tourist or resort market. The pitch is higher gross income than a long-term lease on the same property. A place that might rent for $2,000 a month on an annual lease could bring in more than that in a single busy week during peak season.

The catch is that the higher income comes with far more work and far more volatility. You're running a small hospitality business: cleaning between guests, managing bookings, absorbing the slow season, and handling the wear that constant turnover creates. Two risks deserve real weight. The first is regulation, since more cities and towns are capping or banning short-term rentals, and a rule change can wipe out your model overnight. The second is seasonality, which makes your cash flow lumpy in a way a long-term lease never is.

The tax treatment has its own quirk. Rent a property to others for 14 days or fewer in a year and the income is generally tax-free, a rule worth knowing if you have a vacation home you use yourself. Short-term rentals fit hands-on investors in genuine tourist markets who can manage the intensity and can survive a regulatory shift.

4. House flipping (fix-and-flip)

Flipping is buying a property below market, renovating it, and reselling within about a year. It's the strategy television has oversold the most, and the numbers explain why caution is warranted. The typical flip recently earned a gross return of about 25.5%, roughly $66,000 in gross profit on a median purchase near $260,000. That sounds strong until you read the word gross. That figure is calculated before rehab costs and holding costs, which flipping veterans estimate run between 20% and 33% of a property's after-repair value. Net margins are far thinner, and that gross return was recently the lowest since the last housing crash.

Flipping is capital-intensive and fast-moving. Most flips are bought with cash or short-term financing, and a typical project runs around five months from purchase to resale. Your risks are renovation overruns, a soft market when you're ready to sell, and the carrying cost of the loan while the property earns nothing.

One tax point matters here: a flip is inventory, not a long-term hold, so the profit is taxed as ordinary income and doesn't qualify for the 1031 exchange or long-term capital-gains treatment. Flipping suits experienced, active investors with construction knowledge, a margin of safety in their numbers, and the stomach for a deal that can go sideways. When margins are this compressed, the discipline of walking away from a thin deal is the whole game.

5. Wholesaling

Wholesaling is the one strategy here that doesn't require you to buy the property at all. You find a motivated seller, sign a contract to purchase at a set price, and then assign that contract to an end buyer for a fee before closing. Done well, your capital at risk is little more than the earnest money, and your profit is the assignment fee.

It sounds like a shortcut, and it's the strategy most prone to overpromising. Your income depends entirely on finding good deals and lining up buyers, which is a marketing and negotiation grind, not a passive stream. It's also the strategy with the most legal variation. Several states regulate who can market a property under contract and how, so the rules where you operate matter a great deal. Get that part wrong and a quick deal turns into a licensing problem.

Wholesaling fits entrepreneurial people with strong local networks and negotiating skill who want to participate in real estate without the capital a purchase requires. The income is irregular and deal-dependent, so it's better understood as a hustle than an investment in the buy-and-hold sense. It does build market knowledge fast, which can be a foundation for the more capital-heavy strategies later.

Passive, market-traded ways to invest

These strategies hand the property management to someone else and, in most cases, hand you liquidity in return. You can buy and sell many of them in seconds through an ordinary brokerage account, and the minimum to start can be the price of a single share. What you give up is control. You don't pick the buildings, set the rents, or time the sales.

6. Publicly traded REITs

A real estate investment trust is a company that owns or finances income-producing property, and by law it has to pay out at least 90% of its taxable income to shareholders as dividends. A publicly traded REIT trades on a stock exchange like any other stock, so the entry price is the cost of one share, often under $100, and you can sell same-day. That combination, real estate exposure with stock-like liquidity, is why REITs are so widely held. Roughly 170 million Americans, about half of all households, own them, usually inside a retirement account without realizing it.

The long-run numbers are strong. Over the past 25 years, the main index of American equity REITs has returned about 9.4% a year, and about half of that total return came from dividends rather than price gains. Recently, equity REITs yielded around 3.7%, well above the broad stock market's yield.

Now the honest part. REITs are liquid, which means they're volatile. In a single bad year the index has fallen roughly 25%, and rate-sensitive sectors like office have had a rough stretch. This is exactly where the rate lens pays off, because a REIT is priced partly on its yield versus safer bonds, so REIT prices often react sharply when rates move, for the same reasons an AmeriSave capital-markets view tracks: the bond market and the dollar. A REIT can be the right long-term holding and still hand you a stomach-churning year. They suit almost any investor who wants diversified, hands-off exposure and can sit through the swings without selling at the bottom.

7. REIT mutual funds and ETFs

If a single REIT is one company, a REIT fund is a basket of them. Real estate mutual funds and exchange-traded funds hold dozens or hundreds of REITs at once, so a single purchase spreads your money across property types, regions, and management teams. There are hundreds of these funds, and they show up in nearly every target-date retirement fund, which is a big reason so many people own real estate without ever buying a building.

The appeal is diversification and simplicity at the lowest possible effort. An ETF trades intraday like a stock; a mutual fund settles once a day at its net asset value. Either way, the minimum is small and the management is entirely someone else's job. The costs are an expense ratio, the fund's annual fee, and the same rate-driven and market-driven swings that hit REITs generally, smoothed a little by the diversification.

Funds suit investors who want the broadest, most hands-off exposure they can get and would rather not bet on any single company. For most people building a long-term portfolio, a low-cost REIT fund is the simplest way to own the asset class. It's the closest thing to owning real estate the way you'd own an index fund.

8. Non-traded and private REITs

Not every REIT trades on an exchange. Non-traded REITs are sold through brokers, and private REITs are offered through private placements, sometimes only to accredited investors, people who meet income or net-worth thresholds set by regulators. They own the same kinds of property as their public cousins and pay the same sort of dividends, but they behave very differently in one important way: you can't sell them with a click.

That illiquidity is the whole story. A non-traded REIT typically offers only limited windows to redeem your shares, and those windows can be capped or suspended when a lot of investors want out at once. Because the shares don't trade daily, there's also no live market price, which makes them harder to value and easier to misjudge. Fees and sales commissions tend to run higher than on public REITs, and in some structures the dividends have been paid partly from new investor money rather than property income, a pattern worth asking about directly.

These fit income-focused investors who understand exactly what they're giving up on liquidity and fees, and who don't need the money back on short notice. For most people, the public version does the same job with far fewer surprises.

9. Mortgage REITs and real estate debt

Most REITs own buildings. Mortgage REITs own the loans instead. They finance real estate by buying or originating mortgages and mortgage-backed securities, and they earn the spread between what they pay to borrow and what those loans yield. They've helped finance more than a million homes. Their dividends are often eye-catching, recently well into double digits, because the business runs on borrowed money and a thin interest-rate spread.

That leverage cuts both ways, and this is the corner of real estate investing most exposed to the rate lens from earlier. A mortgage REIT's profit is the gap between short-term borrowing costs and longer-term mortgage yields, so when rates move the wrong way or that gap compresses, earnings and share prices can drop fast. It's the same interest-rate spread that shapes what a lender like AmeriSave can offer a borrower. In a recent stretch, mortgage REITs posted a small loss for the year even as property-owning REITs gained.

The broader category here is real estate debt, investing in the loans behind property rather than the property itself, whether through a mortgage REIT, a private lending fund, or individual notes. It suits investors who want income and understand that they're taking on interest-rate and credit risk in exchange for that yield. If the double-digit yield is the only thing you're looking at, you're looking at the wrong number.

Pooled and private deals

These strategies let a group of investors pool money into deals that would be out of reach individually. You get a slice of a larger property or project without buying the whole thing yourself, and a sponsor or platform does the operating work. The trade-off is that your money is usually locked up for years, and the deal quality depends heavily on the operator.

10. Real estate crowdfunding and online platforms

Online real estate platforms let you put relatively small amounts into specific deals, an apartment complex, a development project, or a pool of loans, alongside many other investors. Regulators set the guardrails. Under one exemption, a deal can raise up to $5 million a year from the general public, with limits on how much a non-accredited investor can put in across all such deals in a year. Larger offerings under a different rule can raise up to $75 million, and many deals are open only to accredited investors.

The appeal is access. You can own a fractional piece of a large commercial deal that would once have required serious wealth and connections. The reality is that these investments are speculative and illiquid. Securities bought this way generally can't be resold for a year, and there's rarely a real secondary market after that, so you should expect to hold to the end of the deal. Your outcome depends on the sponsor's execution and the platform's diligence, and you can lose the entire investment.

These fit investors who want fractional access to private deals, understand the illiquidity, and are spreading small amounts across several deals rather than betting big on one. Treat the platform's marketing return as a hope, not a promise.

11. Real estate syndications and partnerships

A syndication is the private version of pooling money into a single large property. A sponsor, acting as the general partner, finds and operates the deal, often a large apartment building or commercial property, and limited partners put in capital and stay passive. Minimums commonly start around $25,000 to $100,000 or more, and most of these deals are offered only to accredited investors under a private-placement rule.

The economics usually work like this: limited partners get a preferred return first, then split the remaining profit with the sponsor, who earns a larger share as a reward for finding and running the deal. Your capital is typically locked for the length of the hold, often five to ten years, with little ability to exit early. The returns flow through on a partnership tax form, and depreciation from the property can shelter part of that income, one reason these structures appeal to higher-income investors.

The central risk is the sponsor. You're backing their judgment, their leverage, and their execution, and a strong market can't fully rescue a weak operator. Syndications fit accredited investors who want passive exposure to institutional-scale property, have done real diligence on the sponsor, and can leave the money untouched for years.

Bigger and specialized plays

These last two round out the picture. One is the institutional heavyweight of the asset class; the other is the most speculative corner of it. Both are worth understanding even if you never buy them directly, because they shape how the rest of the market prices and behaves.

12. Commercial real estate

Commercial real estate covers income-producing property that isn't small residential: office buildings, retail centers, warehouses and industrial space, and apartment complexes of five units or more. Direct ownership sits at the high end of the capital scale, often requiring hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars, which is why most people reach it through a REIT or a syndication rather than buying a building outright.

Commercial property is valued differently from a house. Instead of comparing recent sales, investors price it off the income it produces using a capitalization rate, the annual net operating income divided by the property's value. Rearrange that and value equals income divided by the cap rate, so when required returns rise, values fall even if the rent hasn't changed. A higher cap rate signals higher perceived risk and a lower price; a lower cap rate signals the opposite.

The rate lens matters enormously here. A large amount of commercial mortgage debt comes due and has to be refinanced on a rolling basis, and when it rolls over at higher rates, it pressures values, a risk the Federal Reserve has flagged in its own stability reporting. That commercial-debt refinancing wave is exactly the sort of rate risk an AmeriSave capital-markets view watches, even though most people access commercial property through funds. Office space has been under particular strain as work patterns shifted. Commercial real estate suits institutional and accredited investors directly, and everyone else through the funds and REITs that hold it.

13. Raw land

Raw or undeveloped land is the most speculative strategy on this list. You buy a parcel and hold it, betting that it appreciates, that you can develop it, or that you can sell it to someone who will. There's no building, so there's no rent and no tenant, which also means no monthly income to cover your costs while you wait.

That's the core tension. Land produces nothing while you own it, yet it still costs you: property taxes, and sometimes loan payments, with no cash flow to offset them. Your return rides entirely on appreciation or a change in the land's use, and the buyer pool for undeveloped land is thin, so selling can take a long time. Zoning and entitlement decisions can make or break the value, and those are largely outside your control.

Land isn't depreciable for tax purposes the way a building is, though it can qualify for a 1031 exchange when held for investment. It suits patient, well-capitalized investors and developers who can carry the holding costs for years and who understand the local rules that govern what a parcel can become. For most investors building income and equity, land is a specialist's tool, not a starting point.

How leverage and the rate stack change the math

Borrowing is what makes real estate different from most other investments, and it's where the rate lens turns practical. Leverage magnifies returns in both directions. Put 25% down on a rental and the property only has to rise a little for the gain on your actual cash to be large, and it works exactly the same way in reverse if values fall. Using other people's money well is the quiet engine behind a lot of real estate wealth, and using it carelessly is behind a lot of the losses.

When you finance an investment property, the rate you're quoted isn't a single number handed down from nowhere. It's the top of a stack. Lenders price a base rate and then adjust it up or down based on the loan, and you can pay to move your place on that stack. Here a distinction most borrowers miss becomes real money: there's a difference between buying your rate down and a buydown. Buying the rate down means paying points upfront to lower the interest rate for the full life of the loan. A buydown is a different structure, where the rate is lower for the first year or few years only, then steps up to the underlying note rate. Builders and sellers advertising a buydown are usually offering the temporary one. Both can be right; they do very different things. Ask which one you're being quoted and exactly how long the lower rate lasts.

The strategy that ties this together is the one I come back to most. In a high-rate environment, focus on price first, then rate. When you've negotiated the right property at the right price, lock the rate that's available and move forward, even if it's higher than you'd like. When rates are high, prices are usually under pressure, so the negotiated price is the durable advantage. The rate can be refinanced later, when the cycle turns; the price cannot be renegotiated once the deal closes. Time the home around the mortgage, not the mortgage around the home.

That sequence, lock the available rate, keep the price you won, and refinance when rates fall, is stronger than the common advice to simply wait for rates to drop, because waiting usually means competing with every other buyer who also waited. This is the rate-stack thinking the loan teams at AmeriSave walk borrowers through, and it applies whether you're buying your own home or a rental. The lever you control is the price and the timeline. Play those well and let the rate come to you later.

What the tax code does for real estate investors

The tax treatment of real estate is a large part of why it builds wealth, and it rewards owning and holding over trading. A few features do most of the work.

The first is depreciation. The tax code lets you deduct the cost of a building, not the land, over a set number of years, even while the property is likely rising in value. For residential rental property that period is 27.5 years; for commercial property it's 39 years. That yearly deduction can shelter a chunk of your rental income from tax, which is why a property that cash-flows modestly on paper can still be efficient after taxes. The trade-off comes later, because when you sell, the depreciation you claimed is recaptured and taxed.

The second is the 1031 exchange, and it's the reason so many investors never seem to pay tax on their gains. When you sell an investment property and reinvest the proceeds into another like-kind investment property, you can defer the capital-gains tax rather than pay it now. The rules are strict and the clock is unforgiving: you have 45 days from the sale to identify the replacement property and 180 days to close, and the exchange only covers real property held for investment, so a flip held for resale doesn't qualify. Deferred correctly and repeated, it lets gains compound without the yearly tax drag.

The third feature helps the passive investor. Qualified dividends from REITs are generally eligible for a 20% deduction, so a portion of your REIT income escapes tax entirely at the individual level. And for direct owners, the tax code allows many landlords to use up to $25,000 of rental losses against other income each year, subject to income limits, a cushion in the early years when depreciation and expenses often outrun the rent.

None of this is tax advice, and the details turn on your own situation, so a qualified tax professional is worth the fee here. The broad point holds regardless: the code is built to favor the long-term owner over the short-term trader. Depreciation rewards holding. The 1031 exchange rewards reinvesting instead of cashing out. The REIT dividend deduction rewards the passive holder. Read together, they explain a good deal of why real estate keeps showing up in the portfolios of people who build lasting wealth. The tax code is quietly on the side of patience.

How to choose the type that fits you

With 13 options on the table, the choice gets easier if you run each one through the same short filter instead of chasing whichever return looks biggest this week.

Start with time horizon, the same question I open with on any rate decision. If you might need the money within a year or two, the illiquid strategies, rentals, syndications, private deals, and land, are the wrong fit no matter how attractive the return, because getting out early is costly or impossible. Liquid options like publicly traded REITs and REIT funds fit a shorter or less certain horizon. The longer and more certain your horizon, the more the illiquid, higher-control strategies can work for you.

Next, be honest about effort. Do you want a second job or a background investment? Rentals, flips, short-term rentals, and wholesaling all demand real, ongoing time and skill. REITs, funds, and most passive deals ask for almost none. A lot of disappointment traces back to people buying an active strategy while wanting a passive life.

Then weigh risk with the lens I trust most: frequency and magnitude. How often does a given risk actually hit, and how big is the damage when it does? A rental's vacancy is frequent but usually small and survivable. A flip's market-timing risk is less frequent but can be severe. A syndication's sponsor risk is rare to surface but potentially total. Sizing both axes keeps you from treating a small, common annoyance and a rare, catastrophic loss as the same sort of problem, which is how portfolios quietly get built wrong.

Finally, match the financing to the plan before you fall for a property, the same way a capital-markets desk lines up the structure before the trade. If you'll borrow, know your rate stack, protect the price, and keep refinancing on the table for later. That's the discipline the teams at AmeriSave bring to the financing side, and it's the same discipline that serves you on the property side. Pick the type that fits your timeline, your appetite for work, and your tolerance for the specific risks involved. The vehicle is the last decision, not the first.

The bottom line

Real estate rewards patience and punishes activity for its own sake. The 13 strategies here aren't a ranking from worst to best; they're a menu, and the right choice is the one that fits your timeline, your appetite for hands-on work, and your tolerance for the particular risks each one carries.

If there's a single thread running through all of them, it's that the meaningful moves are few. Wealth in this asset class isn't built on fifty trades. It's built on a handful of good decisions made for the right reasons and held long enough for the tax code, the loan paydown, and appreciation to do their slow work. Activity feels productive. Quality is what compounds.

The cost of money sits underneath every one of these choices, so treat it as a lever, not a mystery. You can't control where rates go. You can control your timeline, the price you negotiate, and whether you refinance when the cycle turns. Read the bond market and the dollar, protect the price, and let the rate come to you.

A useful question to close on is the one I ask myself before any big financial decision: what would you regret in two years, and what could you change today to avoid it? For most people the answer isn't picking the perfect strategy. It's starting with a sound one that fits their life and giving it time. When you're ready to weigh the financing behind any of these, that's a conversation worth having with a lender like AmeriSave before you fall in love with a property.

Cam Findlay
Cam Findlay
EVP, Capital Markets

Cam brings 30 years of expertise in capital markets, residential mortgage lending, and risk management to AmeriSave. A Certified Mortgage Banker (CMB) with dual degrees in Business with a Finance & Economics specialization, he previously led capital markets at GoodLeap and managed derivative books at Discover Financial. Originally from Australia, he is now a single father of two based in Newport Beach, CA, focused on translating complex market dynamics into actionable insights for homeowners and industry professionals.

Frequently Asked Questions

Publicly traded REITs and REIT funds are the easiest starting point for most people. You can buy them in an ordinary brokerage account for the price of a single share, they require no property management, and you can sell them the same day. They give you real estate exposure without the cash, time, or concentration risk of owning a building. The trade-off is that you give up control and ride the market's swings.

It depends entirely on the type. You can start with the price of one REIT share, often under $100, through a fund or brokerage account. Buying a rental property is a different scale, because an investor loan usually wants 20% to 25% down, which can mean $85,000 or more on a median-priced home, plus closing costs and a repair reserve. House hacking sits in between, since living in the property lets you use a much smaller owner-occupant down payment.

It can be, as long as you focus on the right lever. High rates usually put pressure on prices, so a well-negotiated purchase price is easier to win when rates are high and other buyers step back. The rate you pay can be refinanced later when the cycle turns; the price you negotiate cannot be changed after closing. Timing the property around the financing, rather than waiting for rates to drop, is often the stronger play.

An active investment means you own and operate the property yourself, like a rental or a flip, trading your time and effort for more control and a larger share of the profit. A passive investment means someone else does the operating work while you hold a share, like a REIT or a syndication, trading control for liquidity and simplicity. Neither is better; they fit different timelines and different appetites for hands-on work.

Usually, but the tax can often be deferred. Selling an investment property normally triggers capital-gains tax and the recapture of the depreciation you claimed. A 1031 exchange lets you defer that tax by reinvesting the proceeds into another like-kind investment property within strict deadlines, 45 days to identify the replacement and 180 days to close. This isn't tax advice, so confirm the details with a qualified tax professional before you act.

Not necessarily, because they carry different risks rather than less risk. A REIT is diversified across many properties and is easy to sell, which lowers the concentration risk of owning a single building, but its price is volatile and can drop sharply in a bad year. A rental is less liquid and more concentrated, yet its value doesn't flash red on a screen every day. The right choice depends on your timeline and whether you can hold through the swings.